Skip to content

Point and Shoot Cameras

I thought of another consideration for depth of field context. This is when using a smaller point and shoot camera. These cameras have put photography in the hands of almost everyone who walks in public. You cannot go out without seeing a tourist pointing a camera. Thus I wanted to address how depth of field occurs in these cameras. As you probably know, the lens on them is very small. If you are not familar with focal lengths, basically it is defined as the distance from the focal plane(where the pictures actually gets recorded – film if you will) to the end of the lens. It is usually calculated in millimeters for standardization. For reference, a macro or wide lens in photographer terms usually is anything 35mm or less. The next is called a normal lens and is 50mm for a standard SLR camera. Another term used is telephoto lens which usually means greater than 80mm. A note, these numbers are for SLR cameras only. Calculating the focal length totally depends on what format of camera being used. A large format camera has a normal lens which is different than 50mm. If you wish to know how to calculate it, read this Wiki Article. Also you might wonder what f-stop means when referring to aperture. Well the formula that yields the f number is focal length divided by diameter. Ok back to lenses. The average point and shoot usually has a small zoom lens which varies from 12mm to 35mm give or take a few. In other words, a wide lens. So as you learned in the discussion about depth of field, wide lenses, other factors ignored, yield a high depth of field (totally clear background). So when shooting photos with a point and shoot, most of the situations will make it difficult to get a shallow depth of field if that is what you are after.? Another note about point and shoots is that the f-stop generally cannot go smaller than f6 and often not even that small. I have found even if the camera is set to its automatic portrait mode, you still see a clear background, as in the above example. My face, sunglasses, eyes, nose, and other attributes along with everything outside the train window are clearly identifiable.? If for example I wanted the window and outside to be blurry, I would have needed a smaller aperture and/or a longer lens which is unavailable on point and shoot cameras.? The programmed f-stop for these cameras is usually between f2 to f6 if that depending on the zoom level.? So because of both of these factors, it is nearly impossible to get a shallow depth of field unless your subject has his nose pressed to the camera lens :)? I hope this information has been helpful for novice photographers.

Flash Photographs

60mm at f5.6
60mm at f5.6 should yield less depth of field but you can see more background
55mm at f4.5
55mm at f4.5 should have less depth of field but you can see more background

I wanted to do a follow up posting to the one about Depth of Field.? I forgot to mention that as I learned when I started taking indoor photos with flash, depth of field can be affected by using a flash too.? Let me post a few example photos so you can see what I mean.? In the two examples above, the differences are subtle.? For example, the drag queen clawing at you, the only blurry area is the lower part of her dress.? That is closest to the lens.? Everything in this background is clear.? Also in the photo with male acrobats notice the man’s face on lower portion is blurry while the other face and the equipment on the left are clear.? The clapping hands are blurred too.? This result for f4 should have given slightly less depth of field.? My intent was actually to just get the stilted guy on top in focus and have the rest blurred.? To do that, I would have needed f2 or f1 and would have needed a longer lens and to distance myself from the subject.? The other challenge was the fog machine.? In clubs with a fog machine that makes a fake smokey environment, the flash often can bounce.? And thus you get less light in the exposure.? I guess I could go on and on about flash photography variables since this has become my specialty now but just ask in comments if you are curious about a certain scenario.

Upgrade 2.6.2 – New Theme

I did the quickie upgrade process which I have down pat now for minor patch updates (2.6.x) so that all you need do is delete wp-admin , wp-includes, and main directory php files (with exception of config) and just transfer over these new files.? You do not need to deactivate plugins when its an minor update.? If its x.x(like 2.6 to 2.7 shortly) then the proper full process is to deactivate all plugins, delete wp-admin and wp-includes directories, delete main php files with exception of config files, copy the files from pc to server, run upgrade.php script, activate plugins one at a time, updating them if needed, that is it.? Lastly I am curious if everyone likes my new theme I chose.? I have changed colors in the style and made some font changes too.? If there is something simple that you think would be an improvement, I am all ears.? Thanks.

Depth of Field Determination

A fairly simple way to determine Depth of Field (DOF) when using an SLR camera is by following some simple steps.? There are three factors which determine how ‘deep’ or ‘shallow’ your photo is rendered.? First is the distance between the focal plane(camera) and the subject.? If you are close to the subject, say a few feet, without other considerations, you will get a low DOF or in lay terms, the background will be blurry.? If you are far away, say across a large room, again other factors aside, you will get high DOF or in lay terms, the background will be clear.? Second is the focal length of your lens.? At shorter lengths (for sake of discussion 20mm-100mm approx) , other factors ignored, you should get deep DOF (clear background).? At longer lengths (for sake of discussion 200mm and up), you should get shallow DOF (blurry background).? Third is aperture (the size of that tiny hole that opens and closes).? If you use an f-stop of f2 or f4 you should get shallow(low) DOF (blurry background).? If you use an f-stop of f16 or f22 you should get deep(high) DOF (clear background).? F stop is the size of that hole and the numbers start from largest opening (f1) to smallest opening(f32 for most SLR lenses).? So those three factors being said, if you combine them, here is what you should get:

  • Focal Length (short) + Aperture Wide(f2) + Distance from Subject(close) = Blurred background(low DOF) mostly because of the wide aperture
  • Focal Length (short) + Aperture Wide(f2) + Distance from Subject(far) = Blurred background(low DOF) mostly because of the wide aperture
  • Focal Length (short) + Aperture Narrow(f32) + Distance from Subject(close) = Clear background(high DOF) mostly from the narrow aperture
  • Focal Length (short) + Aperture Narrow(f32) + Distance from Subject(far) = Clear background(high DOF) mostly from the narrow aperture
  • Focal Length (long)? + Aperture Wide(f2) + Distance from Subject(far) = Very blurred background(low DOF) because of the long focal length and wide aperture
  • Focal Length (long)? + Aperture Wide(f2) + Distance from Subject(close) =not possible, subject cannot be close with this focal length
  • Focal Length (long)? + Aperture Narrow(f32) + Distance from Subject(close) =not possible, subject cannot be close with this focal length
  • Focal Length (long)? + Aperture Narrow(f32) + Distance from Subject(far) = Fairly clear background(low DOF) mostly from the narrow aperture(the long focal length should lessen clarity)

Of course the in between values here will yield different results but hopefully if I explained well enough you should be able to calculate it approximately.? For example, 22mm lens, f8, subject=close should give you moderate DOF (somewhat clear background).? If you wanted it totally clear, use a smaller f stop(f16,f32,f64).

A few more examples: 300mm, f4,? subject(far) should give you a very blurry background(low DOF). 300mm, f16, subject(far) should yield somewhat clear background(moderate DOF) due to aperture.? See where I am going with this.? In general, mostly you will not determine subject distance.? What you can vary is the aperture and the focal length(possibly with a zoom lens).? In Summary,? to get more DOF(clearer background), use a small aperture and/or short lens.? To get less DOF(blurrier background), use a large aperture and/or long lens.? Typically for portraits, 100mm lens, f2 or f4, subject at moderate distance should yield a very blurred background(low DOF).? Hopefully my experience with these variables will help you to be a better photographer.

USA Wifi Hotspot Options

There have been some recent changes to the big providers of wifi hotspots, those which are not free. So here is an update with all currently available wifi options in the USA. I currently use TMobile which provided hotspots at all Starbucks, Borders, Fed Ex Kinkos, and some hotels and airports. However Starbucks decided to cancel their contract and change to ATT. Also Fed Ex canceled their contract for service. You cannot access wifi any longer at Kinkos locations. All Starbucks locations now are ATT Wifi spots. Tmobile customers will always have roaming access but the login process needs improvement. ATT contracted wayport, a third party provider of network access points. Most of the Starbucks locations have been successfully transitioned. But there are a few of them which either do not allow login properly or simply are non-functional. TMobile currently charges 19.99 a month (if you have cell service with them, otherwise 29.99).? Another solution for paid wifi access from a laptop, PDA, or any 802.1x capable device, ATT Wifi offers several locations.? ATT charges 19.99 for people who do not have their DSL services at home. If you do, costs are 9.99 or free depending on the level of broadband you have at home. The drawback I found to this option was that most of their hotspot locations (McDonalds, Starbucks, Hotels) were implemented with only a DSL line. Therefore if more than one person was using the location, speeds sucked. Another paid option is called Boingo. They contract with other providers(like ATT) to offer access from almost any paid location. See list below for rates and location info. If you just refuse to pay, there are many free wifi hotspots in most cities. These are usually at independent coffee shops and other places. Sometimes they are much less reliable or may be down since you never pay for them. Many major cities do offer free service at local libraries. These are reliable and usually on a fast backbone. The only exception to that which I have found is in smaller towns where the backbone is saturated or not high speed.? One last thing to mention, cell companies provide wifi access over their cell networks too.? You need to purchase a special proprietary card which usually is PCMCIA compatible.? Besides that cost, you have to join a yearly plan with monthly costs varying from 49 to 89 dollars.? This is the most expensive option.? It is usually only used for business users and services are paid by the employer. For information on these services, visit Verizon, Sprint, ATT cellular websites.? So in quick sum, options:

  1. ATT Wifi
  2. T Mobile
  3. Boingo Wifi
  4. Free Hotspot Locator